Palestinians Still Not Denied Right to Dream

Israel saying the ICJ remained “silent during the Holocaust” when the court didn’t exist yet, shows Israel has no answers to the ICJ orders, writes Vijay Prashad.

By Vijay Prashad
Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research

Judges at the International Court of Justice on Jan. 26 (ICJ) found it “plausible” that Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. 

The ICJ called upon Israel to “take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts” that violate the U.N. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948).

As part of its “provisional measures,” the ICJ called upon Israel to respond to the court within a month and outline how it has implemented the order.

Though Israel has already rejected the ICJ’s findings, international pressure on Tel Aviv is mounting.

Algeria has asked the U.N. Security Council to enforce the ICJ’s order while Indonesia and Slovenia have initiated separate proceedings at the ICJ that will begin on Feb. 19 to seek an advisory opinion on Israel’s control and policies on occupied Palestinian territories, pursuant to a U.N. General Assembly resolution adopted in December 2022.

In addition, Chile and Mexico have called upon the International Criminal Court (ICC) to investigate crimes committed in Gaza.

Israel’s reaction to the ICJ’s order was characteristically dismissive. The country’s national security minister, Itamar Ben Gvir, called the ICJ an “anti-Semitic court” and claimed that it “does not seek justice, but rather the persecution of Jewish people.” 

Strangely, Ben Gvir accused the ICJ of being “silent during the Holocaust.” The Holocaust conducted by the Nazi German regime and its allies against European Jews, the Romani, homosexuals, communists and others took place from late 1941 until May 1945 when the Soviet Red Army liberated prisoners from Ravensbrück, Sachsenhausen, and Stutthof concentration camps.

The ICJ was established in June 1945, one month after the Holocaust ended, and began its work in April 1946. Israel’s attempt to delegitimise the ICJ by saying it remained “silent during the Holocaust” when it was, in fact, not yet in existence, and then to use that false statement to call the ICJ an “anti-Semitic court” shows that Israel has no answer to the merits of the ICJ order.

Meanwhile, the bombardment of Palestinians in Gaza continues. My friend Na’eem Jeenah, director of the Afro-Middle East Centre in Johannesburg has been reviewing the data from various government ministries in Gaza as well as media reports to circulate a daily information card on the situation. 

The card from Jan. 26, the date of the ICJ order and the 112th day of the genocide, details that over 26,000 Palestinians, at least 11,000 of them children, have been killed since 7 October; 8,000 are missing; close to 69,000 have been injured; and almost all of Gaza’s 2.3 million residents have been displaced. 

The numbers are bewildering. During this period, Israel has damaged 394 schools and colleges, destroying 99 of them as well as 30 hospitals and killing at least 337 medical personnel.

This is the reality that occasioned the genocide case at the ICJ and the court’s provisional measures, with one judge, Dalveer Bhandari of India, going further to say plainly that “all fighting and hostilities [must] come to an immediate halt.”

Amongst the dead are many of Palestine’s painters, poets, writers and sculptors. One of the striking features of Palestinian life over the past 76 years since the Nakba (“Catastrophe”) of 1948 has been the ongoing richness of Palestinian cultural production. 

In the past, a brisk walk down any of the streets of Jenin or Gaza City would reveal the ubiquity of studios and galleries, places where Palestinians insist upon their right to dream.

In late 1974, the South African militant and artist Barry Vincent Feinberg published an article in the Afro-Asian journal Lotus that opens with an interaction in London between Feinberg and a “young Palestinian poet.”

Feinberg was curious why, in Lotus, “an unusually large number of poems stem from Palestinian poets.” The young poet, amused by Feinberg’s observation, replied: “The only thing my people have never been denied is the right to dream.”

Malak Mattar, born in December 1999, is a young Palestinian artist who refuses to stop dreaming. Malak was 14 when Israel conducted its Operation Protective Edge (2014) in Gaza, killing over 2,000 Palestinian civilians in just over one month – a ghastly toll that built upon the bombardment of the Occupied Palestinian Territory that has been ongoing for more than a generation. 

Malak’s mother urged her to paint as an antidote to the trauma of the occupation. Malak’s parents are both refugees: her father is from al-Jorah (now called Ashkelon) and her mother is from al-Batani al-Sharqi, one of the Palestinian villages along the edge of what is now called the Gaza Strip. 

On Nov. 25, 1948, the newly formed Israeli government passed Order Number 40, which authorised Israeli troops to expel Palestinians from villages such as al-Batani al-Sharqi.

“Your role is to expel the Arab refugees from these villages and prevent their return by destroying the villages… Burn the villages and demolish the stone houses,” wrote the Israeli commanders.

Malak’s parents carry these memories, but despite the ongoing occupation and war, they try to endow their children with dreams and hope. Malak picked up a paint brush and began to envision a luminous world of bright colours and Palestinian imagery, including the symbol of sumud (“steadfastness”): the olive tree.

Since she was a teenager, Malak has painted young girls and women, often with babies and doves, though, as she told the writer Indlieb Farazi Saber, the women’s heads are often titled to the side. That is because, she said,

“If you stand straight, upright, it shows you are stable, but with a head tilted to one side, it evokes a feeling of being broken, a weakness. We are humans, living through wars, through brutal moments… the endurance sometimes slips.”

Malak and I have corresponded throughout this violence, her fears manifest, her strength remarkable. In January, she wrote, “I’m working on a massive painting depicting many aspects of the genocide.” 

On a 5-metre canvas, Malak created a work of art that began to resemble Pablo Picasso’s celebrated Guernica (1937), which he painted to commemorate a massacre by fascist Spain against a town in the Basque region. 

In 2022, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) published a profile on Malak, calling her “Palestine’s Picasso.” In the article, Malak said, “I was so inspired by Picasso that, in the beginning of my art journey, I tried to paint like him.” 

This new painting by Malak reflects the heartbreak and steadfastness of the Palestinian people. It is an indictment of Israel’s genocide and an affirmation of Palestinians’ right to dream.

If you look at it closely, you will see the victims of the genocide: the medical workers, the journalists and the poets; the mosques and the churches; the unburied bodies, the naked prisoners, and the corpses of small children; the bombed cars and the fleeing refugees.

There is a kite flying in the sky, a symbol from Refaat Alareer’s poem “If I Must Die” (“you must live to tell my story… so that a child, somewhere in Gaza while looking heaven in the eye… sees the kite, my kite you made, flying up above and thinks there is an angel there bringing back love”).

Malak’s work is rooted in Palestinian traditions of painting, inspired by a history that dates back to Arab Christian iconography (a tradition that was developed by Yusuf al-Halabi of Aleppo in the 17th century).

That “Aleppo Style,” as the art critic Kamal Boullata wrote in Istihdar al-Makan, developed into the “Jerusalem Style,” which brightened the iconography by introducing flora and fauna from Islamic miniatures and embroidery. 

When I first saw Malak’s work, I thought of how fitting it was that she had redeemed the life of Zulfa al-Sa’di (1905–1988), one of the most important painters of her time, who painted Palestinian political and cultural heroes. 

Al-Sa’di stopped painting after she was forced to flee Jerusalem during the 1948 Nakba; her only paintings that remain are those that she carried with her on horseback.

Sa’di spent the rest of her life teaching art to Palestinian children at an UNRWA school in Damascus. It was in one such UNRWA school that Malak learned to paint. Malak seemed to pick up al-Sa’di’s brushes and paint for her.

It is no surprise that Israel has targeted UNRWA, successfully encouraging several key Global North governments to stop funding the agency, which was established by United Nations General Assembly Resolution 302 in 1949 to “carry out direct relief and works programmes for Palestine refugees.”

[See: By Hurting UN Agency, the West Sides With Genocide]

In any given year, half a million Palestinian children like Malak study at UNRWA schools. Raja Khalidi, director-general of the Palestine Economic Policy Research Institute (MAS), says of this funding suspension:

“Given the long-standing precarious nature of UNRWA’s finances… and in light of its essential role in providing vital services to Palestine refugees and some 1.8 million displaced persons in Gaza, cutting its funding at such a moment heightens the threat to life against Palestinians already at risk of genocide.”

I encourage you to circulate Malak’s mural, to recreate it on walls and public spaces across the world. Let it penetrate into the souls of those who refuse to see the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people.

Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter. He is an editor of LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. He is a senior non-resident fellow at Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, Renmin University of China. He has written more than 20 books, including The Darker Nations and The Poorer Nations.  His latest books are Struggle Makes Us Human: Learning from Movements for Socialism and, with Noam Chomsky,  The Withdrawal: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and the Fragility of U.S. Power.

This article is from Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research.

Views expressed in this article may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.